The ins and outs of the EU referendum

At 1pm today, or 4am in Bucharest, I attempted to listen to the news on Romanian radio. My Romanian just allowed me to discern that one of the items was the hot-off-the-press Brexit poll, giving Leave a ten-point lead. That poll is by a company called ORB, and their methodology leads me to conclude that it’s complete garbage just like their previous polls, some of which gave Remain a whopping lead. (I’d love to see polling banned altogether in the last four weeks before an election or referendum.) But I think there has been a genuine move to the Leave side, and I’d now put Britain’s chances of leaving the EU at 50:50, perhaps even a shade higher. The betting markets still make Remain the favourites by about a 70:30 margin, but I don’t buy that. The high rollers are backing Remain; the mums and dads with a few quid to spare are backing Leave. Many people treat their bets as votes (and likewise their votes as bets) and a clear majority of bets are on Leave. I’d bet on Leave myself, because I think it represents great value, if it wasn’t for all the complications involved in setting up an online account in some non-sterling foreign currency (I say non-sterling because I expect the pound to plummet in the event of a Leave win).

The zeitgeist is very much with Leave, and that’s hard to combat. The scare tactics by the Remain side certainly aren’t cutting through. They needed to frame staying in the EU as something positive to vote for. In fact as I watch from the other side of the world, the level of debate from both sides has been appalling. What’s the plan if the UK stay in? What’s the plan if they/we decide to pull out? Maybe none of that matters. Maybe people aren’t interested in the facts anyway. All I hear about is even more dreadful immigrants if we stay and a third-world economy if we leave.

Dad registered with hours to spare before the original deadline, and he might well vote “out” (he happens to be in the UK so he’ll vote at the local polling station). I suspect my brother will vote “out”. I voted “in”, and I’m not ashamed to say that was largely out of self-interest. [Yikes. Another poll out with a ten-point lead for Leave. Phew, it’s the same one. Please tell me it’s the same one. See, they shouldn’t have polls at all this close to the vote.] This plan of mine isn’t just a plan, it’s a dream. It’s a long time since I had a dream with a realistic chance of becoming reality. If Britain wasn’t in the EU, my dream wouldn’t exist. I readily admit I’m too selfish to vote against my dream. I might still be able to live and work in the EU for some time because the “divorce” is unlikely to be immediate, but I don’t know. Nobody knows.

Another reason to vote “in”, for my mind, is that the “in” people seem nicer. I bet most of the English hooligans in Marseille are voting “out”. The CAPS LOCK “BREXIT!” brigade on online forums are mostly “outers”. The people who didn’t want voting extended after the website crashed (their stupid fault for leaving it till the last minute; sod ’em) were mostly “outers”, which is ironic considering how much they keep banging on about democracy. Most importantly the Conservatives who are likely to take over in the event of Brexit don’t seem particularly warm and fluffy, not even Boris Johnson.

Despite all that, I wonder how I’d vote if I still lived and worked in, say, Peterborough. It’s so long since I lived in the UK that I was only just eligible to vote. It’s six years since I even set foot in the country. If I’d seen the influx of Polish plumbers first-hand, I might well be voting out now.

Romania lost 2-1 to France this morning in the first match of Euro 2016. I was impressed with the number of Romanian fans there. I remember all the hype surrounding Euro ’96 which was played in the UK. It was huge, and all played with the catchy tune in the background that talked about thirty years of hurt (since England won the World Cup). It’s now fifty years. And talking of the nineties, two-hit wonders Ace of Base are playing on Romanian radio.

Gerrymandering – stop the madness!

Feeling better about my living situation, because I know it won’t last for ever, has enabled me to think of other things, such as…

Gerrymandering. A lot of people know this word without knowing what it means. It’s a political term for the process of dividing an area (in the US, a state) into districts so as to give one party disproportionate power. Each state in the US is divided into a number of congressional districts, each of which elects one member to the House of Representatives. In the case of North Carolina, which was mentioned on Al Jazeera tonight, prompting me to write this post, there are 13 districts. By law, each district has roughly the same population. In the state of North Carolina as a whole, support is just about evenly split between the Republicans and Democrats. But the Republicans control 10 of the 13 districts! How? Well, because they have control of the state, they get to draw the boundaries between the districts. And that’s how you end up with maps like this. The “before” map is absolutely batshit crazy, right? The aim of the Republicans is to pack lots of Democrat-voting people (in this instance African-American people) into as few districts as possible, conceding those districts by massive margins, while hoovering up all the remaining districts by far smaller margins. So what starts out as 50:50 becomes anything but. The same thing goes on in (most?) other states, such as Illinois, where districts have shapes that are just as absurd. And the Democrats engage in this process too. It’s totally undemocratic, just like so much of America’s “democracy”; power is taken out of the hands of the people and placed in the hands of the few who draw those goddamn maps. It also leads to massive inefficiencies and in some cases (like in North Carolina) expensive lawsuits.

Unlike so much of American politics, where I wouldn’t know where to start trying to sort out, gerrymandering is a problem that I could solve myself. Give me a week and a decent GIS program, and from almost the other side of the world, I could make the US significantly more democratic than it is now. I’d respect geographical features and centres of population, but pay no attention whatsoever to racial or other demographic data: drawing boundaries along racial lines is part of the problem. Of course it would be better if the US could abandon the district system altogether and bring in something like STV (which could even help end the horrible two-party system) but you have to start somewhere.

North Carolina and four other states vote in the presidential primaries in a few hours’ time. Donald Trump might have one hand on the Republican nomination this time tomorrow. Although I think he’s odious, he’s giving the biggest middle finger to the system (even if he has the smallest hands) and when people are so desperate and fed up, that has a definite appeal.